Of the multitude of strategies discussed this week for increasing work enjoyment for staff, what is your favorite/most preferred strategy discussed in this module? How will you integrate this strategy into your supervision practice in the future? What will it look like when you implement it with a supervisee/trainee? Are there any practices discussed that you will avoid in your supervision in the future, and why?
Strategies:
Providing positive feedback when staff perform well
Identifying individualized reinforcers
Reducing aversive control and/or micromanagement
Reducing aversiveness of job tasks or working environments Developing plans for ongoing professional development of staff Providing mentorship and coaching on self-care repertoires
- Read Reid, Parsons, & Green's Supervisor's Guidebook: Chapter 6 – Supporting proficient work performance: Positive feedback
- Read Reid, Parsons, & Green's Supervisor's Guidebook: Chapter 7 – Supporting proficient work performance: Special recognition procedures
- Read Reid, Parsons, & Green's Supervisor's Guidebook: Chapter 9 – Promoting Staff Work Enjoyment
APA Format
Rubiric attached
Check for AI & Plagiarism
Reflection Paper Rubric (25 points) Reflection papers consist of brief responses to a prompt related to the information shared in each week’s module. Using both the assigned materials and external references, the student should thoughtfully and thoroughly respond to the prompt. During the following week, students will be required to provide feedback on a peer’s reflection paper, and will be required to paste the text of their completed peer review into their own submission comments in Canvas, which will allow for the instructor to grade more easily. Reflection paper assignments will be graded as follows:
Category 5 points 3 points 0 points Reflection Length* *(excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words)
Reflection paper content was greater than 150 words.
Reflection paper content was between 100-149 words.
Reflection paper content was less than 99 words.
Grammar, Usage, and Spelling
Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.
Reflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors.
Reflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent.
References and Utilization of Outside Resources
The author used references from peer- reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided.
The author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional peer-reviewed behavioral reference or did not include a hyperlink to the externally-cited reference.
The author neither utilized APA format for referenced material used nor cited an outside peer-reviewed behavioral reference.
Addressing the Prompt
The author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing.
The author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing.
The author’s reflection paper does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas.
Application The author’s post clearly demonstrates application and relationship to the week’s assigned reading/topic.
The author’s post refers to the assigned topic/reading tangentially but does not demonstrate application.
The author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading.
Peer Review – Your peer review text must be copied and pasted into the comments of your own reflection paper submission to receive credit.
Completes peer-review of colleague’s reflection paper and provides well-thought- out, thorough feedback.
Completes peer-review of colleague’s reflection paper, but provides only vague, non-specific feedback or input.
Does not complete peer- review of a colleague’s reflection paper or does not copy the text into the comments section of their own submission to allow for grading.
Late reflection papers will adhere to the general submission policy found on the Virtual Course Schedule.